To Judge and To Justify
Steve Fuller
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Geisteswissenschaften, Kunst, Musik / Erwachsenenbildung
Beschreibung
This book argues that judging and justifying are the two skills that specifically require academic training. In the current times, where the value of a university degree is increasingly questioned, it’s important to emphasize the significance of these skills. This volume addresses that universities are not necessarily stressing these skills, preferring instead to focus on the delivery of ‘content’ and the provision of ‘credentials’. Its main focus is on articulating the positive case for the university’s focus on judging and explaining as its core ‘transferable skills.’ It involves examining the historical and philosophical case for this claim, canvassing arguments made – and the example set -- by Plato, Francis Bacon, Immanuel Kant, William Whewell, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Paul Feyerabend, Richard Rorty, John Rawls and Robert Nozick – as well as considering how they might be realized in today’s world.
This book extends the arguments in Fuller’s recent book, Back to the University’s Future: The Second Coming of Humboldt (Springer, 2023).
Kundenbewertungen
Future of higher education, William Whewell, Knowledge as a Public Good, Immanuel Kant, Paul Feyerabend, Thomas Kuhn, Judgement and Explanation as Academic Skills, Judgement skills, Explanation skills, Karl Popper, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Richard Rorty, Judging and explaining, Plato, Robert Nozick, Philosophy of higher education, John Rawls, Francis Bacon, Knowledge as a public good, Value of a university education