Leseprobe
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
THE GREAT CANADIAN TAX HOAX
BURTON KELLOCK
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Recht
Beschreibung
In this book, Burton Kellock explains how Canadian law teachers, their students, politicians and the general public have been induced to believe that the Canadian Constitution authorizes the Parliament of Canada to impose federal taxes for the purpose of donating the proceeds of those taxes to the governments of the provinces in defiance of the Constitution. The truth is that the Fathers of Confederation decided that this should not and could not be done under the Constitution they drafted and became the British statute originally known as the British North America Act 1867 and remains Canada’s Constitution to this day.
_____________________________________
There is scarcely anything more necessary or bracing in a free society than an open challenge to prevailing orthodoxy. In this book, Mr. Kellock has issued a big challenge to the constitutional orthodoxy of what looks very much like a legal plunder by which Canada’s federal government has been soaking taxpayers to underwrite its own schemes of national control over the provinces. Readers who treat themselves to the feast of detailed legal argument presented here will wait in some excitement for a response from what is sure to be a confused orthodoxy.
-- William D. Gairdner, PhD, Author of The Trouble With Canada ...Still!, and of The Great Divide: Why Liberals and Conservatives Will Never, Ever Agree.
Kundenbewertungen
Constitutionality, Fathers of Confederation, Legislative Assemblies, Nova Scotia, Ottawa, Provinces of Upper and Lower Canada, British Parliament, law teachers, British North America, British statutes, Canada, Canada's Constitution, Tax Hoax, Assets, Taxation, Ontario, Constitution Act, Sir John A. Macdonald, Canadian Constitution, Parliament, Quebec City, Provincial Parliaments, Sir Joseph Pope, Federal/Provincial Transfer Payments, Legislatures of Canada, Province of Canada, The BNA Act, BNA Act, Quebec Conference, Sir Edward Coke, HOAX KEYWORDS Burton Kellock, Privy Council, Parliament of Canada, Consolidated Revenue Fund, Provincial Governments, Constitutional Law of Canada, Federal State, Public Service of Canada, The Proponent's Propositions, levy taxes, British Colony, Federal Parliament, Provincial Government, Confederation, The Proponents' Arguments, governments of the provinces, taxation, 1867, Canadians, Insurance Act, Parliament of the U.K, the Proponents, Quebec, politicians, Appropriation Act, George Brown, Federal tax money, TAX HOAX, Revenues, The Constitution Act 1867, The Constitution of Canada, The History of the BNA Act, C.L.O.C., Constitution, New Brunswick, Federal/Provincial fiscal transfers, federal taxes, Fathers of Canadian Confederation, for the purpose of donating taxes, impose federal taxes, British North America Act, British North America Act 1867, F.P.F.T., students, Constitution Act 1982, Debts, Federal Government, Canadian Provinces, general public, The C.L.O.C.'s Arguments