Leseprobe
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
A Guide to Civil Procedure
Brooke Coleman (Hrsg.), Elizabeth Porter (Hrsg.), Portia Pedro (Hrsg.), Suzette Malveaux (Hrsg.)
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Ratgeber / Recht, Beruf, Finanzen
Beschreibung
Shines a light on the ways in which civil procedure may privilege—or silence—voices in our justice system
In today’s increasingly hostile political and cultural climate, law schools throughout the country are urgently seeking effective tools to address embedded inequality in the United States legal system. A Guide to Civil Procedure aims to serve as one such tool by centering questions of systemic injustice in the teaching, learning, and practice of civil procedure.
Featuring an outstanding group of diverse scholars, the contributors illustrate how law school curriculums often ignore issues such as race, gender, disability, class, immigration status, and sexual orientation. Too often, students view the #MeToo movement, Black Lives Matter, immigration/citizenship controversy, or LGBTQ+ issues as mere footnotes to their legal education, often leading to the marginalization of many students and the production of graduates that do not view issues of systemic injustice as central to their profession.
A Guide to Civil Procedure reveals how procedure is, and always has been, a central pressure point in the struggle to eradicate structural inequality and oppression through the courts. This book will give students and scholars alike a more complex view of their roles as attorneys, sharpen their litigation skills, and provide a stronger sense of community and purpose in the law school classroom.
Kundenbewertungen
Interest Convergence, Disability theory, Other-ing, Critical feminist theory, Critical race theory, Bankruptcy, Deconstruction and reconstruction, implicit bias, Procedural justice, Bias, Prisoner, Child welfare, Class actions, Arbitration, Empirical, Judges, Discovery, Motion to dismiss, Efficiency, poverty law, Assimilation, Critical, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Violence, low-income litigants, Intersectional, queer, Trans-substantive, commonality, Indian Child Welfare Act, judicial demographics, Americans With Disabilities Act, Excessive Force, Race and gender bias, Disparate impact, Fees, Disruption, Racism, Disability, LGBTQ+, Equality, Recusal, Power dynamics, Domestic and “foreign” law, debt collection, Intersectionality, Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Marginalized, Indian, Proposition 8, Pro se, Employment discrimination, Transsubtantivity, Eviction, Local rules, Inferences, Cognition and cognitive psychology, Children, Queer theory, Summary judgment, Prison litigation, Outsiders, Heuristics, Pleading, same-sex marriage, Racial Fortuity, Class action, Aggregation, Asymmetric decision-making, Neutrality, Systemic inequality, conflicts of interest, Fines, Class, Personal Jurisdiction