img Leseprobe Leseprobe

Great Cases in Constitutional Law

Robert P. George (Hrsg.)

EPUB
ca. 46,99
Amazon iTunes Thalia.de Hugendubel Bücher.de ebook.de kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble bol.com Legimi yourbook.shop Kulturkaufhaus ebooks-center.de
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Princeton University Press img Link Publisher

Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Recht

Beschreibung

Slavery, segregation, abortion, workers' rights, the power of the courts. These issues have been at the heart of the greatest constitutional controversies in American history. And in this concise and thought-provoking volume, some of today's most distinguished legal scholars and commentators explain for a general audience how five landmark Supreme Court cases centered on those controversies shaped the country's destiny and continue to affect us even now. The book is a profound exploration of the Supreme Court's importance to America's social and political life. It is also, as many of the contributors show, an intriguing reflection of what some have seen as an important trend in legal scholarship away from an uncritical belief in the essentially benign nature of judicial power.


Robert George opens with an illuminating survey of the themes that unite and divide the five cases. Other contributors then examine each case in detail through a lively commentary-and-response format. Mark Tushnet and Jeremy Waldron exchange views on Marbury v. Madison, the pivotal 1803 case that established the power of the courts to invalidate legislation. Cass Sunstein and James McPherson discuss Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), the notorious case that confirmed the rights of slaveowners, declared that black people could not be American citizens, and is often seen as a cause of the Civil War. Hadley Arkes and Donald Drakeman explore the legacy of Lochner v. New York (1905), a case that ushered in decades of judicial hostility to social welfare laws. Earl Maltz and Walter Murphy assess Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954), the famous case that ended racial segregation in public schools. Finally, Jean Bethke Elshtain and George Will tackle Roe v. Wade (1973), still a flashpoint a quarter of a century later in the debate over abortion. While some of the contributors show sympathy for strong judicial interventions on social issues, many across the ideological spectrum are sharply critical of judicial activism.


A compelling introduction to the greatest cases in U.S. constitutional law, this is also an enlightening glimpse of the state of the art in American legal scholarship.

Weitere Titel von diesem Autor

Kundenbewertungen

Schlagwörter

Griswold v. Connecticut, Legislation, Supremacy Clause, Test case (law), Discretion, Lawyer, African Americans, Precedent, Prosecutor, Roe v. Wade, Abortion-rights movements, Brown v. Board of Education, Chief Justice, Dred Scott, Political science, United States Constitution, Suggestion, Politician, Affirmative action, Robert Bork, Constitutionalism, Institution, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Substantive due process, Liberalism, Lochner v. New York, Missouri Compromise, Sex selection, Dred Scott v. Sandford, Abortion law, Constitutional crisis, Constitutional law, Judicial interpretation, Law of the United States, Planned Parenthood, Deliberation, United States federal judge, Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Legislator, Privacy, Attempt, Freedom of speech, Originalism, Amendment, Judiciary, Presumption (canon law), Statute, Law school, Preamble, Due Process Clause, Due process, Legislature, Marbury v. Madison, Desegregation, Virtue, Abortion, Jurisprudence, Politics, Ronald Dworkin, Criticism, Americans, Cooper v. Aaron, Rule of law, Slavery, Fetus, Constitutional amendment, Plaintiff, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Constitutionality