He Runs, She Runs

Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates

Deborah Jordan Brooks

EPUB
ca. 34,99
Amazon iTunes Thalia.de Hugendubel Bücher.de ebook.de kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble bol.com Legimi yourbook.shop Kulturkaufhaus ebooks-center.de
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Princeton University Press img Link Publisher

Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Politikwissenschaft

Beschreibung

While there are far more women in public office today than in previous eras, women are still vastly underrepresented in this area relative to men. Conventional wisdom suggests that a key reason is because female candidates start out at a disadvantage with the public, compared to male candidates, and then face higher standards for their behavior and qualifications as they campaign. He Runs, She Runs is the first comprehensive study of these dynamics and demonstrates that the conventional wisdom is wrong.


With rich contextual background and a wealth of findings, Deborah Jordan Brooks examines whether various behaviors--such as crying, acting tough, displays of anger, or knowledge gaffes--by male and female political candidates are regarded differently by the public. Refuting the idea of double standards in campaigns, Brooks's overall analysis indicates that female candidates do not get penalized disproportionately for various behaviors, nor do they face any double bind regarding femininity and toughness. Brooks also reveals that before campaigning begins, women do not start out at a disadvantage due to gender stereotypes. In fact, Brooks shows that people only make gendered assumptions about candidates who are new to politics, and those stereotypes benefit, rather than hurt, women candidates.


Proving that it is no more challenging for female political candidates today to win over the public than it is for their male counterparts, He Runs, She Runs makes clear that we need to look beyond public attitudes to understand why more women are not in office.

Kundenbewertungen

Schlagwörter

Politics, Result, Toughness, Anecdotal evidence, Michele Bachmann, Career, Attribution (psychology), Rick Perry, Learning, Effectiveness, Politician, The White House Project, Competition, National Women's Political Caucus, Year of the Woman, Power broker (politics), Criticism, Nancy Pelosi, Respondent, Sarah Palin, Barack Obama, Member of Congress, Hillary Clinton, Dartmouth College, Disadvantage, Nomination, Methodology, Political climate, Meta-analysis, Geraldine Ferraro, Emotionality, Barbara Boxer, Proscription, Indication (medicine), Sex differences in humans, Newsweek, Headline, Political party, Foreign policy, John McCain, Finding, Sexism, Legislator, Linda Fowler, F-test, Glass ceiling, George W. Bush, Double standard, Gender role, P-value, Women in government, Conventional wisdom, Role congruity theory, Voting, Opinion poll, Incumbent, Political science, Psychology, Party leader, Anger, Interaction, Public administration, New Hampshire primary, Pundit, Prediction, Public opinion, Femininity, Statistical significance, Adviser, Candidate