Taming the River
Margarita A. Mooney, Mary J. Fischer, Douglas S. Massey, et al.
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Geisteswissenschaften, Kunst, Musik / Schulpädagogik, Didaktik, Methodik
Beschreibung
Building on their important findings in The Source of the River, the authors now probe even more deeply into minority underachievement at the college level. Taming the River examines the academic and social dynamics of different ethnic groups during the first two years of college. Focusing on racial differences in academic performance, the book identifies the causes of students' divergent grades and levels of personal satisfaction with their institutions.
Using survey data collected from twenty-eight selective colleges and universities, Taming the River considers all facets of student life, including who students date, what fields they major in, which sports they play, and how they perceive their own social and economic backgrounds. The book explores how black and Latino students experience pressures stemming from campus racial climate and "stereotype threat"--when students underperform because of anxieties tied to existing negative stereotypes. Describing the relationship between grade performance and stereotype threat, the book shows how this link is reinforced by institutional practices of affirmative action. The authors also indicate that when certain variables are controlled, minority students earn the same grades, express the same college satisfaction, and remain in school at the same rates as white students.
A powerful look at how educational policies unfold in America's universities, Taming the River sheds light on the social and racial factors influencing student success.
Kundenbewertungen
Bachelor's degree, Institution, Latino studies, Master's degree, Howard University, Mixed-sex education, Sex ratio, Ethnic studies, Higher education, Grading (education), F-test, Historically black colleges and universities, Graduation, Immediate family, Savage Inequalities, Fair Housing Act, Grandparent, Grutter v. Bollinger, Voting Rights Act of 1965, Emotional well-being, Course credit, African-American studies, Stereotype threat, Racial segregation in the United States, Student loan, Asthma, Socioeconomic status, Social stigma, Dormitory, Statistical significance, Social alienation, Opportunity cost, Advanced Placement, Tuition payments, Early decision, Demography, Internalization, Fraternities and sororities, Profession, Student benefits, Self-efficacy, Racial segregation, National Longitudinal Surveys, One-drop rule, Extended family, Thesis, Racialization, Reverse discrimination, Extracurricular activity, Minority group, White people, Gratz v. Bollinger, Selective school, Short-term memory, Need-blind admission, Babysitting, Affirmative action, Sampling (statistics), College Board, Private school, Social distance, Academic achievement, Black people, Ethnic group, SAT, Sophomore, African Americans, Brown v. Board of Education, Oppositional culture, Racism